Chhattisgarh 1857 and the Freedom Movement in Chhattisgarh

Veer Narayan Singh and 1857 in Chhattisgarh

Veer Narayan Singh of Sonakhan, the 1856 famine, his escape and execution in 1857, and Hanuman Singh's Raipur sepoy revolt of January 1858.

11 min read Updated Oct 2026 #veer narayan singh#sonakhan#1857 revolt

Prerequisites

The Hook: A Stadium, a Chowk and a Famine

Connect

India’s cricket fans know the Shaheed Veer Narayan Singh International Cricket Stadium at Nava Raipur. Raipur residents know Jaistambh Chowk (जयस्तंभ चौक) in the heart of the city. The two are linked by one man. In a famine year he opened a hoarder’s grain stores to feed starving villagers. A year later the British hanged him in Raipur. He was a zamindar, not a soldier, and he had no royal title.

Who was Veer Narayan Singh, why does Chhattisgarh call him its first martyr of 1857, and what else happened in Raipur during the revolt?

Why it matters: Prelims asks the place (Sonakhan), the year of the famine, the year and place of execution, and the name of the Raipur sepoy rebel (Hanuman Singh). Mains GS-I asks you to assess Chhattisgarh’s role in 1857 and the nature of the resistance.


Background: Chhattisgarh on the Eve of 1857

  • After the death of Raghuji III of Nagpur without a natural heir, the Nagpur kingdom was annexed by the British in 1854 under Dalhousie’s Doctrine of Lapse (हड़प नीति). Chhattisgarh, then ruled from Nagpur, came under direct British rule.
  • The British organised the region as a district with its headquarters at Raipur (रायपुर), under a Deputy Commissioner. The details of this administrative set-up are in British Rule, Princely States and Zamindaris.
  • Much of the region was held by zamindars (ज़मींदार), hereditary chiefs who paid a fixed tribute (takoli) and controlled forested estates. Sonakhan was one such zamindari.
  • Raipur had a military station with Indian sepoys. Their mood in 1857–58 matters for the story below.
Why 1857 in Chhattisgarh looks different
North India’s 1857 was led by sepoys and dispossessed rulers (Delhi, Kanpur, Lucknow, Jhansi). Chhattisgarh had no large sepoy mutiny and no deposed royal court. Its 1857 had two strands: a zamindar’s resistance rooted in famine and local grievances (Veer Narayan Singh), and a small but daring sepoy outbreak at Raipur (Hanuman Singh).

Veer Narayan Singh (वीर नारायण सिंह)

Who he was

FactDetail
Born1795 (as generally given)
HomeSonakhan (सोनाखान) zamindari, in the forests of the present Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara district
CommunityA Binjhwar (बिंझवार) tribal zamindar family
FatherRam Rai, from whom he inherited the zamindari
Title used todayShaheed (शहीद) Veer Narayan Singh, Chhattisgarh’s first martyr of the 1857 struggle

Sequence of events

timeline
    title Veer Narayan Singh, 1856 to 1857
    1856 : Severe famine in the region
         : Grain of a Kasdol trader seized and given to the hungry
    24 October 1856 : Arrested at Sambalpur and lodged in Raipur jail
    August 1857 : Escapes from Raipur jail with help from sympathisers among the sepoys
                : Returns to Sonakhan and raises a force of about 500 men
    Late 1857 : British force under Captain Smith moves against Sonakhan
    10 December 1857 : Hanged at Raipur, at the spot now called Jaistambh Chowk
  1. The famine of 1856. The region suffered a severe famine. A trader at Kasdol (कसडोल) was holding stocks of grain. Narayan Singh asked him to release it for the starving villagers. When the trader refused, Narayan Singh seized the grain and distributed it among the hungry. The British treated this as looting.
  2. Arrest (24 October 1856). He was arrested at Sambalpur and imprisoned in Raipur jail.
  3. Escape (August 1857). As the revolt spread across India in 1857, he escaped from Raipur jail. Accounts credit help from sympathetic sepoys and local people.
  4. Armed resistance. Back at Sonakhan he raised a force of about 500 men and prepared to resist. The British sent troops under Captain Smith. Neighbouring zamindars were pressed to help the British, and Narayan Singh was isolated.
  5. Capture and execution. He fell into British hands in December 1857 (some accounts describe a surrender to save his people). He was hanged on 10 December 1857 at Raipur. The place of execution is identified with present-day Jaistambh Chowk.

Why he matters (Mains analysis)

  • Social cause before political cause: his first act was famine relief against a hoarder. His resistance began as a moral economy protest (“the hungry have a right to grain”) and merged with the 1857 revolt only later.
  • Tribal and peasant leadership: he shows that 1857 in central India was not only a sepoy affair. Forest chiefs and their followers also fought.
  • Limits: the rising was local, short and isolated. Other zamindars did not join, and the British could concentrate force against Sonakhan. This mirrors the wider weakness of 1857: no common plan or leadership across regions.
  • Memory and identity: after 2000 the state made him a symbol of Chhattisgarh’s identity. The state’s Raipur cricket stadium carries his name. The Shaheed Veer Narayan Singh Memorial and Tribal Freedom Fighters Museum at Nava Raipur Atal Nagar was opened around the state’s 25th foundation day (November 2025). The Government of India issued a commemorative postage stamp on him in 1987.
One line for Mains
Veer Narayan Singh turned a famine-relief act into armed resistance. That makes him both Chhattisgarh’s first martyr of 1857 and an early example of tribal-peasant protest against colonial rule.

Hanuman Singh and the Raipur Sepoy Revolt (January 1858)

Veer Narayan Singh’s execution did not end resistance in Raipur.

FactDetail
WhoHanuman Singh (हनुमान सिंह), a magazine lascar (ammunition-store worker) with the 3rd Regiment of the Nagpur force stationed at Raipur
WhatOn 18 January 1858 he and two companions attacked and killed Sergeant-Major Sidwell, the British officer of the unit
SupportHe urged the sepoys to rise; 17 sepoys joined him in trying to seize the ammunition store
ResponseBritish forces under Lieutenant Smith surrounded the rebels. The 17 were captured
PunishmentThe 17 sepoys were hanged on 22 January 1858 in front of the assembled troops
Hanuman Singh’s fateHe escaped and was never captured, although the British announced a reward of ₹500 for him

He is often called “the Mangal Pandey of Chhattisgarh”, because, like Mangal Pandey at Barrackpore, he attacked a British officer and appealed to fellow sepoys to rise.

Reading the Raipur outbreak
The outbreak shows that sepoys at Raipur were sympathetic to the revolt, which also fits the accounts of help given to Narayan Singh’s escape in 1857. But only 17 men joined, and the British crushed it within days. The swift public hanging was meant as a warning to the rest of the garrison.

Memory Tricks

Narayan's numbers: 56-57, 24-10
Famine 1856 → Escape 1857 → Hanged 10 December 1857. The arrest is 24 October 1856, and the hanging is 10 December 1857. Both dates hold a “10”: 24/10 and 10/12.
Hanuman's 18-17-22
“Eighteen he struck, seventeen were caught, twenty-two they hanged.” 18 January 1858: Sidwell killed. 17 sepoys arrested. 22 January 1858: they were hanged. Hanuman Singh himself escaped.
Two Smiths
Captain Smith marched against Sonakhan (1857). Lieutenant Smith surrounded Hanuman Singh’s men (1858). If an option names “Smith”, check which event the question is about.

Don’t Confuse

ThisvsThat
Veer Narayan Singh: zamindar of Sonakhan, hanged 10 Dec 1857Hanuman Singh: sepoy (magazine lascar) at Raipur, revolt 18 Jan 1858, never caught
Arrest at Sambalpur, 24 Oct 1856Hanging at Raipur, 10 Dec 1857
Kasdol: where the hoarded grain was seizedSonakhan: his zamindari and base of resistance
Sergeant-Major Sidwell: officer killed in 1858Captain Smith: officer sent against Sonakhan in 1857
Dhurwa Rao (Lingagiri, Bastar): hanged 1856Veer Narayan Singh (Sonakhan): hanged 1857. See Tribal Revolts

Common Mistakes

Trap 1: the famine year is 1856, not 1857
The grain episode and the arrest happened in 1856, before the revolt began in May 1857. Only the escape, the resistance and the execution belong to 1857.
Trap 2: Hanuman Singh was not hanged
A statement such as “Hanuman Singh and 17 sepoys were hanged at Raipur in 1858” is wrong. The 17 sepoys were hanged on 22 January 1858; Hanuman Singh escaped and was never captured.
Trap 3: Sonakhan is not in Bastar
Sonakhan lies in the plains-forest belt north-east of Raipur (Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara district today), not in Bastar. Bastar’s resistance of the same period (for example Dhurwa Rao of Lingagiri, 1856) is a separate story.

Practice

These are original practice questions written in CGPSC style. They are not previous-year questions.

Level 1: Foundation

  1. Veer Narayan Singh was the zamindar of ________.
  2. He was hanged at Raipur on ________.
  3. The magazine lascar who killed Sergeant-Major Sidwell at Raipur in January 1858 was ________.
Answers
  1. Sonakhan
  2. 10 December 1857
  3. Hanuman Singh

Level 2: Prelims MCQs

Q1. Consider the following statements about Veer Narayan Singh:

  1. He was arrested in 1856 after distributing a trader’s hoarded grain among famine-hit villagers.
  2. He escaped from Raipur jail in 1857 and organised armed resistance at Sonakhan.
  3. He was hanged at Sambalpur in 1858.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 only (b) 1 and 2 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer and explanation
(b) 1 and 2 only. Statement 3 is wrong on both counts. Sambalpur is where he was arrested (24 October 1856). He was hanged at Raipur on 10 December 1857, at the spot now known as Jaistambh Chowk.

Q2. Match List-I with List-II:

List-IList-II
A. Sonakhan1. Grain of a hoarding trader seized in 1856
B. Kasdol2. Execution of Veer Narayan Singh
C. Raipur3. Zamindari of Veer Narayan Singh
D. Sambalpur4. Arrest of Veer Narayan Singh in 1856

(a) A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4 (b) A-1, B-3, C-2, D-4 (c) A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2 (d) A-3, B-2, C-1, D-4

Answer and explanation
(a) A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4. Sonakhan was his zamindari; the hoarded grain was at Kasdol; he was arrested at Sambalpur and hanged at Raipur.

Q3. The Raipur sepoy outbreak of 18 January 1858 was led by:

(a) Gend Singh (b) Hanuman Singh (c) Surendra Sai (d) Dhurwa Rao

Answer and explanation
(b) Hanuman Singh, a magazine lascar of the 3rd Regiment at Raipur, who killed Sergeant-Major Sidwell. Gend Singh led the Paralkot revolt (1825) and Dhurwa Rao the Lingagiri revolt (1856), both in Bastar. Surendra Sai led resistance at Sambalpur, now in Odisha.

Q4. How many sepoys were hanged at Raipur on 22 January 1858 after Hanuman Singh’s outbreak?

(a) 7 (b) 12 (c) 17 (d) 21

Answer and explanation
(c) 17. Seventeen sepoys who joined Hanuman Singh were captured and hanged in front of the troops on 22 January 1858. Hanuman Singh escaped and was never caught.

Level 3: Mains Answer Writing

Q1. Assess the role of Veer Narayan Singh in the Revolt of 1857 in Chhattisgarh. (150–200 words)

Model answer outline

Intro: Veer Narayan Singh, the Binjhwar zamindar of Sonakhan, is honoured as Chhattisgarh’s first martyr of 1857 (hanged at Raipur, 10 December 1857).

Body:

  1. Context: British annexation of Nagpur (1854) brought the region under direct rule; zamindars faced new demands and a distant administration.
  2. Famine of 1856: he seized a Kasdol trader’s hoarded grain for starving villagers, and was arrested at Sambalpur (24 October 1856).
  3. Link with 1857: escaped from Raipur jail in August 1857, reportedly with sepoy help, and raised about 500 men at Sonakhan.
  4. Suppression: a force under Captain Smith; isolation from other zamindars; capture and public execution.
  5. Significance: shows the agrarian and tribal face of 1857; inspired Hanuman Singh’s sepoy outbreak (January 1858) and later Chhattisgarhi identity.
  6. Limits: local, short-lived, without allies or a wider plan.

Conclusion: His revolt was small in scale but large in meaning: a protest for the hungry that became a fight against colonial rule.

Q2. “1857 in Chhattisgarh was a revolt of peasants and sepoys rather than of princes.” Discuss. (250 words)

Model answer outline

Intro: Unlike Awadh or Jhansi, Chhattisgarh had no dispossessed court leading the revolt in 1857.

Body:

  1. Peasant-tribal strand: Veer Narayan Singh’s famine-relief act and resistance at Sonakhan.
  2. Sepoy strand: Hanuman Singh’s outbreak at Raipur (18 January 1858); 17 sepoys hanged on 22 January.
  3. Why no princely leadership: the Nagpur Bhonsle line had already lapsed (1854); feudatory chiefs and many zamindars stayed with the British or were pressed into helping them.
  4. Bastar’s parallel resistance: Dhurwa Rao of Lingagiri (1856), which shows that forest communities had their own grievances.
  5. Outcome: quick suppression; the British leaned more on loyal chiefs.

Conclusion: The statement largely holds. Chhattisgarh’s 1857 was popular and local, which explains both its moral force and its quick defeat.


Quick Revision Table

FactDetail
Annexation of Nagpur1854, Doctrine of Lapse; Chhattisgarh under direct British rule
Veer Narayan SinghBinjhwar zamindar of Sonakhan (Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara district today)
Famine episode1856; trader’s grain at Kasdol distributed to the hungry
Arrest24 October 1856, at Sambalpur; lodged in Raipur jail
EscapeAugust 1857, from Raipur jail
Force raisedAbout 500 men
British commander sentCaptain Smith
Executed10 December 1857, Raipur (Jaistambh Chowk)
Raipur sepoy revolt18 January 1858, Hanuman Singh kills Sgt-Major Sidwell
Sepoys hanged17, on 22 January 1858
Hanuman SinghEscaped, never caught; “Mangal Pandey of Chhattisgarh”

Key Takeaways

Key Takeaways
  1. Veer Narayan Singh of Sonakhan seized hoarded grain in the 1856 famine, was arrested at Sambalpur (24 Oct 1856), escaped in 1857 and was hanged at Raipur on 10 December 1857.
  2. He is honoured as Chhattisgarh’s first martyr of 1857.
  3. Hanuman Singh led the Raipur sepoy outbreak on 18 January 1858; 17 sepoys were hanged on 22 January 1858; he himself was never caught.
  4. Chhattisgarh’s 1857 was a peasant-tribal and sepoy affair, local and quickly suppressed.

What’s Next

Advertisement