Polity
Constitutional and Statutory Bodies
Finance Commission
Article 280, vertical and horizontal devolution, the 15th and 16th Finance Commissions' formulas, grants, and what they mean for Chhattisgarh's finances.
Prerequisites
- Centre–State Relations — the distribution of taxing powers that creates the gap a Finance Commission fills.
- Public Finance — revenue receipts, deficits and the Consolidated Fund.
- State Budget Basics — how central transfers show up in Chhattisgarh’s own budget.
The Hook: Where Raipur’s Rupee Comes From
Connect
When Chhattisgarh’s Finance Minister presents the state budget, one of the largest lines on the receipts side is not a state tax at all. It is the state’s share in central taxes. Income tax paid in Mumbai and Bengaluru partly funds a school in Jashpur or a health centre in Narayanpur.
Who decides what share of the Centre’s taxes goes to the states, and how that share is split between a high-income state and Chhattisgarh? The answer is a body that meets once every five years: the Finance Commission (वित्त आयोग).
Why it matters: Prelims asks Article 280, its composition, the 41% figure and the devolution criteria. Mains asks about fiscal federalism, the changes made by the 16th Finance Commission and the position of states like Chhattisgarh.
Constitutional Provisions
| Article | Provision |
|---|---|
| 280(1) | The President constitutes a Finance Commission within two years of the Constitution’s commencement, and then at the end of every fifth year or earlier if the President thinks necessary |
| 280(1) | Composition: a Chairman and four other members, appointed by the President |
| 280(2) | Parliament may prescribe qualifications and the manner of selection |
| 280(3) | Duties: the Commission makes recommendations to the President (see below) |
| 280(4) | The Commission determines its own procedure and has the powers Parliament confers |
| 281 | The President lays every recommendation before each House of Parliament, with an explanatory memorandum on the action taken |
Qualifications: Finance Commission (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1951
| Member | Qualification |
|---|---|
| Chairman | Experience in public affairs |
| Member 1 | A High Court judge, or a person qualified to be one |
| Member 2 | Special knowledge of the finances and accounts of government |
| Member 3 | Wide experience in financial matters and administration |
| Member 4 | Special knowledge of economics |
Members hold office for the period the President specifies and are eligible for reappointment.
What the Commission recommends: Article 280(3)
| Clause | Duty |
|---|---|
| (a) | Distribution of the net proceeds of shareable taxes between the Union and the states (vertical devolution), and allocation of the states’ share among the states (horizontal devolution) |
| (b) | Principles governing grants-in-aid to the states from the Consolidated Fund of India (Art 275) |
| (bb) | Measures to augment a state’s Consolidated Fund to supplement the resources of panchayats, based on the State Finance Commission’s recommendations. Added by the 73rd Amendment |
| (c) | The same for municipalities. Added by the 74th Amendment |
| (d) | Any other matter referred by the President in the interests of sound finance |
Advisory, but followed
The recommendations are advisory; the Constitution does not make them binding. In practice, the Union government has generally accepted the core recommendations on tax devolution. The 16th Finance Commission’s report was laid in Parliament on 1 February 2026 together with the government’s acceptance.
How the Money Moves
graph TD
A["Gross tax revenue of the Union"] --> B["Minus cesses, surcharges
and cost of collection"]
B --> C["Divisible pool (Art 270)"]
C --> D["Vertical devolution:
41% to all states together"]
D --> E["Horizontal devolution:
formula decides each state's share"]
E --> F["Chhattisgarh's share
(3.407% under the 15th FC)"]
G["Grants-in-aid (Art 275):
local bodies, disaster management, others"] --> H["States"]| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Divisible pool | Union taxes that are shared with the states. Since the 80th Amendment (2000), all Union-list taxes are shareable under Article 270, except those under Articles 268, 269 and 269A, surcharges and cesses for specific purposes |
| Vertical devolution | The states’ combined share of the divisible pool |
| Horizontal devolution | How that share is divided among the states |
| Art 275 grants | Statutory grants-in-aid charged on the Consolidated Fund of India, on the Finance Commission’s recommendation |
| Art 282 grants | Discretionary grants the Union may give for any public purpose. They are outside the Finance Commission’s formula |
Why cesses and surcharges matter
Cesses and surcharges are not in the divisible pool. When the Union relies more on them, states get a smaller share of total central tax revenue, even if the devolution percentage stays at 41%. States, including Chhattisgarh, have raised this repeatedly before Finance Commissions. It is a standard Mains point on fiscal federalism.
The 15th and 16th Finance Commissions
| 15th Finance Commission | 16th Finance Commission | |
|---|---|---|
| Chairman | N.K. Singh | Arvind Panagariya |
| Constituted | November 2017 | 31 December 2023 |
| Award period | 2020–21 (interim report) and 2021–22 to 2025–26 | 2026–27 to 2030–31 |
| Vertical devolution | 41% (down from 42% because Jammu and Kashmir became a Union Territory) | 41% (retained) |
| Report laid in Parliament | — | 1 February 2026, with the government’s acceptance |
Horizontal devolution criteria and weights
| Criterion | 15th FC (2021–26) | 16th FC (2026–31) | What it rewards |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income distance | 45% | 42.5% | Lower per capita income (equity) |
| Population (Census 2011) | 15% | 17.5% | Need |
| Area | 15% | 10% | Cost of delivering services over larger areas |
| Forest and ecology | 10% | 10% | Forest cover, an ecological service to the nation |
| Demographic performance | 12.5% | 10% | Lower fertility; meant to protect states that controlled population |
| Tax and fiscal effort | 2.5% | Dropped | Own tax collection |
| Contribution to GDP | — | 10% (new) | States’ contribution to national output |
How to remember the 16th FC formula
“42.5 for the poor, 17.5 for the people, and three tens for land, forest and fertility, plus a new ten for GDP.” Income distance 42.5, population 17.5, area 10, forest and ecology 10, demographic performance 10, contribution to GDP 10. The total is 100.
Finance Commissions to know
| FC | Chairman | Point to remember |
|---|---|---|
| 1st | K.C. Neogy | Constituted in 1951 |
| 13th | Vijay Kelkar | Vertical share 32% |
| 14th | Y.V. Reddy | Vertical share raised to 42% (2015–20) |
| 15th | N.K. Singh | 41%; first to use Census 2011 population under its terms of reference |
| 16th | Arvind Panagariya | 41%; added contribution to GDP; dropped tax effort |
Chhattisgarh and the Finance Commission
Why the formula matters to Chhattisgarh
- Share (15th FC): Chhattisgarh’s share of the states’ portion of the divisible pool was 3.407% for 2021–26.
- Criteria that help: income distance (per capita income below the national average) and forest and ecology (one of India’s most forested states) work in the state’s favour.
- Criteria that may not: the new contribution to GDP criterion favours states with larger economies.
- Dependence: the share in central taxes is one of the biggest items in the state’s revenue receipts, so each Commission’s formula directly shapes spending on schools, health and roads.
- Local bodies: Finance Commission grants to panchayats and urban bodies reach Chhattisgarh’s Gram Panchayats and municipalities, linked to the State Finance Commission under Article 280(3)(bb) and (c).
Check the state’s own share under the 16th FC in the report or the state budget before quoting a figure in Mains.
Analysis for Mains: The Finance Commission and Fiscal Federalism
Role
- Corrects vertical imbalance: the Union has the more buoyant taxes, while states carry most spending responsibilities (health, police, agriculture, education).
- Corrects horizontal imbalance: equalises the capacity of poorer states to provide comparable services.
- Rule-based and periodic, so transfers are predictable and less discretionary.
Issues
- Cesses and surcharges shrink the divisible pool.
- Tension between equity and efficiency: income distance helps poorer states; contribution to GDP and demographic performance reward richer or southern states. Each change creates winners and losers.
- Terms of reference are set by the Union. Some states have objected to particular references (for example, on the use of 2011 population data under the 15th FC).
- Discretionary transfers outside the formula (Art 282, centrally sponsored schemes) are large and conditional.
- GST has reduced states’ independent taxing power. The GST Council (Art 279A) now decides rates, while the Finance Commission shares the Union’s part of the tax.
- Weak State Finance Commissions limit what can be done under 280(3)(bb) and (c).
Way forward: bring cesses and surcharges into the divisible pool or cap them; consult states on the terms of reference; reduce conditional transfers; strengthen SFCs; and consider a permanent secretariat for continuity between Commissions.
Memory Tricks
Article 280: 'Every 5, 1 + 4'
Constituted every 5 years, with 1 chairman + 4 members. The report goes to the President, who lays it before Parliament under Article 281 (280 forms, 281 informs).
Four members, four skills: 'Judge, Accounts, Admin, Economics'
J-A-A-E: a High Court judge-level person, an accounts expert, a finance and administration veteran, and an economist. The chairman needs only public affairs experience.
Don’t Confuse
| This | vs | That |
|---|---|---|
| Finance Commission (Art 280): constitutional, every 5 years, devolution formula | vs | NITI Aayog: an executive body (2015), set up by a Cabinet resolution, no role in tax devolution |
| Finance Commission: shares Union taxes | vs | GST Council (Art 279A): decides GST rates and exemptions |
| Union FC (Art 280): appointed by the President | vs | State FC (Art 243I, 243Y): appointed by the Governor |
| Art 275 grants: FC-recommended, statutory | vs | Art 282 grants: discretionary, outside the formula |
| Vertical devolution: Union vs states (41%) | vs | Horizontal devolution: among states (formula) |
| 14th FC: 42% | vs | 15th and 16th FC: 41% |
Common Mistakes
Trap 1: the Finance Commission's recommendations are binding
False. They are advisory. Only the explanatory memorandum under Article 281 is mandatory.
Trap 2: the report goes to Parliament directly
False. The Commission reports to the President, who lays it before both Houses.
Trap 3: 41% of all central taxes go to the states
False. 41% is of the divisible pool, which excludes cesses, surcharges and the cost of collection.
Trap 4: the 16th FC used tax effort as a criterion
False. The 16th FC dropped tax and fiscal effort and added contribution to GDP (10%).
Practice
All questions below are original practice questions written in CGPSC style. They are not previous-year questions.
Level 1: Foundation
- The Finance Commission consists of a chairman and ______ other members.
- The chairman of the 16th Finance Commission was ______.
- Clauses (bb) and (c) of Article 280(3) were added by the ______ and ______ Amendments.
Answers
- Four.
- Arvind Panagariya.
- 73rd and 74th.
Level 2: Prelims MCQs
Q1. Consider the following statements about the Finance Commission:
- Its qualifications for members are prescribed by an Act of Parliament.
- It submits its report to the Union Finance Minister, who lays it before Parliament.
- Its recommendations on tax devolution are binding on the Union government.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- (a) 1 only
- (b) 1 and 2 only
- (c) 2 and 3 only
- (d) 1, 2 and 3
Answer and explanation
(a) 1 only. Statement 1 is correct: the Finance Commission (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1951, made under Article 280(2). Statement 2 is wrong: the report goes to the President (Art 281). Statement 3 is wrong: the recommendations are advisory.
Q2. Match List I (Criterion) with List II (Weight under the 16th Finance Commission):
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| A. Income distance | 1. 17.5% |
| B. Population (2011) | 2. 10% |
| C. Contribution to GDP | 3. 42.5% |
| D. Tax and fiscal effort | 4. Not used |
- (a) A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4
- (b) A-1, B-3, C-2, D-4
- (c) A-3, B-2, C-1, D-4
- (d) A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2
Answer and explanation
(a) A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4. Income distance 42.5%, population 17.5%, the new contribution to GDP 10%. Tax and fiscal effort (2.5% under the 15th FC) was dropped.
Q3. Which one of the following is not part of the divisible pool of taxes shared with the states?
- (a) Corporation tax
- (b) Income tax other than on agricultural income
- (c) Cesses levied for specific purposes
- (d) The Union’s share of the Central GST
Answer and explanation
(c). Article 270 excludes surcharges and cesses levied for specific purposes from the shareable taxes. Corporation tax, income tax and CGST are part of the divisible pool.
Q4. Under Article 280(3), the Finance Commission recommends measures to augment the Consolidated Fund of a state to supplement the resources of panchayats. On whose recommendations is this based?
- (a) The NITI Aayog
- (b) The State Finance Commission
- (c) The GST Council
- (d) The Comptroller and Auditor General
Answer and explanation
(b). Clauses (bb) and (c) of Article 280(3) tie the Union Finance Commission’s local body recommendations to the reports of the State Finance Commissions constituted under Articles 243I and 243Y.
Q5. The vertical devolution recommended by the 14th, 15th and 16th Finance Commissions was, respectively:
- (a) 32%, 42%, 41%
- (b) 42%, 41%, 41%
- (c) 42%, 42%, 41%
- (d) 41%, 41%, 42%
Answer and explanation
(b) 42%, 41%, 41%. The 14th FC raised the states’ share to 42%. The 15th FC set 41%, adjusting for Jammu and Kashmir becoming a Union Territory. The 16th FC retained 41%. The 13th FC’s figure was 32%.
Level 3: Mains Answer Writing
Q1. (150–200 words) “The Finance Commission is the balance wheel of Indian fiscal federalism.” Discuss in the light of the 16th Finance Commission’s recommendations.
Model answer outline
- Intro: Article 280 creates a periodic, expert body to share Union taxes with the states and recommend grants. It corrects vertical and horizontal imbalances.
- Body:
- Vertical: 41% of the divisible pool retained by the 16th FC (2026–31), after 42% (14th) and 41% (15th).
- Horizontal: income distance 42.5%, population 17.5%, area, forest and ecology, demographic performance 10% each, and a new 10% for contribution to GDP. Tax effort dropped.
- Balance: equity (income distance, forest) versus efficiency (GDP contribution, demographic performance).
- Concerns: cesses and surcharges outside the pool; Union-set terms of reference; growth of conditional transfers; GST reducing state autonomy.
- Chhattisgarh angle: a lower-income, heavily forested state gains from income distance and forest criteria, but may gain little from GDP contribution. Its 15th FC share was 3.407%. Central transfers are a large part of its revenue receipts.
- Conclusion: the Commission keeps federal finance rule-based. Its role grows stronger if the divisible pool is protected and states have a say in the terms of reference.
Q2. (60 words) Distinguish between the Finance Commission and the GST Council.
Model answer outline
- Finance Commission (Art 280): constituted every five years by the President; recommends sharing of the Union’s taxes and grants; advisory.
- GST Council (Art 279A): a permanent body of the Union Finance Minister and state finance ministers; recommends GST rates, exemptions and thresholds.
- The Council decides how GST is levied; the Commission decides how the Union’s share is distributed.
Quick Revision Table
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Article | 280 (constitution, duties); 281 (report laid with memorandum) |
| Composition | Chairman + 4 members, appointed by the President |
| Frequency | Every 5 years or earlier |
| Qualifications law | Finance Commission (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1951 |
| Chairman’s qualification | Experience in public affairs |
| Local body clauses | 280(3)(bb) — 73rd; 280(3)(c) — 74th |
| Shareable taxes | Art 270 (since the 80th Amendment, 2000); excludes cesses and surcharges |
| Grants | Art 275 (statutory); Art 282 (discretionary) |
| 1st FC | K.C. Neogy, 1951 |
| 14th FC | Y.V. Reddy, 42% |
| 15th FC | N.K. Singh, 41%, 2021–26; Chhattisgarh’s share 3.407% |
| 16th FC | Arvind Panagariya; constituted 31 Dec 2023; 2026–31; 41%; laid 1 Feb 2026 |
| 16th FC weights | Income distance 42.5, population 17.5, area 10, forest and ecology 10, demographic performance 10, GDP contribution 10 |
Key Takeaways
Key Takeaways
- Article 280: a chairman + 4 members, every 5 years, appointed by the President; recommendations are advisory but generally accepted.
- It decides vertical (41% under the 15th and 16th FCs) and horizontal devolution and the principles of grants-in-aid.
- The 16th FC (Arvind Panagariya, 2026–31) added contribution to GDP (10%) and dropped tax effort.
- Cesses and surcharges are outside the divisible pool, a key fiscal federalism concern.
- For Chhattisgarh, income distance and forest criteria matter most. Link the Union FC to the State Finance Commission for local bodies.
What’s Next
- Constitutional and Statutory Bodies — Quick Revision — the whole chapter on one page
- Centre–State Relations — legislative, administrative and financial relations in full
- State Election Commission and State Finance Commission — the state-level counterpart in Chhattisgarh
- Public Finance — the economics of deficits, debt and transfers
Advertisement