Polity Judiciary

High Courts and Subordinate Courts

High Courts (Arts 214-231) and subordinate courts (Arts 233-237) for CGPSC, with the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, Arts 226-227, Lok Adalats.

16 min read Updated Oct 2026 #high court#high court of chhattisgarh#bilaspur

Prerequisites

The Hook: Why Is the High Court in Bilaspur, Not Raipur?

Connect

Ask a friend outside the state where Chhattisgarh’s High Court sits, and most will say Raipur. It is in Bilaspur, on a campus at Bodri, and it opened on 1 November 2000, the very day the state was born. A farmer from Surajpur fighting a land acquisition order, a teacher from Kondagaon challenging a transfer, a family in Kanker seeking habeas corpus all end up on the same road to Bilaspur.

What powers does that court have that even the Supreme Court lacks? Who appoints its judges, and who decides how many there are? And what happens to the lakhs of cases below it, in district courts and Lok Adalats? This page answers them.

Why it matters: Prelims tests the Supreme Court vs High Court differences (retirement age, qualifications, who fixes strength, practice after retirement) and Chhattisgarh-specific facts. Mains asks about Art 227, subordinate courts, pendency and legal aid.


Constitutional Basics (Part VI, Chapter V: Arts 214–231)

ArticleProvision
214There shall be a High Court for each State
215High Courts are courts of record with power to punish for contempt of themselves
216A High Court consists of a Chief Justice and such other judges as the President may from time to time deem necessary
217Appointment, qualifications, tenure (retirement at 62)
218Certain Supreme Court provisions (including the removal procedure) apply to High Courts
219Oath before the Governor or a person appointed by him
220Restriction on practice after being a permanent judge
221Salaries and allowances
222Transfer of a judge from one High Court to another
223Acting Chief Justice, appointed by the President
224Additional judges (for up to 2 years) and acting judges
224ARetired judges at sittings of High Courts
226Power to issue writs
227Superintendence over all courts and tribunals in its territory
228Transfer to itself of cases involving a substantial question of constitutional interpretation
229Officers and servants, appointed by the Chief Justice of the High Court
230Extension of jurisdiction to Union Territories
231Common High Court for two or more States (or States and a UT)

Common High Courts: The 7th Amendment Act, 1956 allowed Parliament to set up one High Court for two or more States. As of 2026 there are 25 High Courts. The oldest are Calcutta, Bombay and Madras (1862), set up under the Indian High Courts Act, 1861; Calcutta is the oldest. The newest is the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati (1 January 2019).

Common High CourtJurisdiction
BombayMaharashtra, Goa, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu
GauhatiAssam, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Nagaland
Punjab and HaryanaPunjab, Haryana, Chandigarh
CalcuttaWest Bengal, Andaman and Nicobar Islands
KeralaKerala, Lakshadweep
MadrasTamil Nadu, Puducherry
Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhThe two Union Territories
High Courts not in the state capital
A favourite one-liner set: Chhattisgarh → Bilaspur · Madhya Pradesh → Jabalpur · Uttar Pradesh → Allahabad (Prayagraj) · Rajasthan → Jodhpur · Odisha → Cuttack · Uttarakhand → Nainital · Kerala → Ernakulam (Kochi).

Appointment, Qualifications and Tenure

Appointment (Art 217(1)): by the President, after consultation with the CJI, the Governor of the State and, for judges other than the Chief Justice, the Chief Justice of that High Court. In practice:

  • the High Court collegium (Chief Justice + 2 senior-most judges) proposes names;
  • the Supreme Court collegium (CJI + 2 senior-most judges, per the Third Judges Case) recommends;
  • the Union Government processes the names and the President appoints.

By convention, the Chief Justice of a High Court is appointed from outside the State (the “outside Chief Justice” policy).

Qualifications (Art 217(2)): a citizen of India who has held a judicial office in India for 10 years, or has been an advocate of a High Court (or two or more in succession) for 10 years. There is no “distinguished jurist” category and no minimum age.

Tenure: until 62 years (raised from 60 by the 15th Amendment, 1963). Disputes about a judge’s age are decided by the President after consulting the CJI, and the decision is final (Art 217(3)).

Removal: in the same manner as a Supreme Court judge (Art 217(1)(b) read with Art 124(4)): an address by both Houses of Parliament, not the State Legislature, by special majority.

Transfer (Art 222): by the President after consulting the CJI. In practice the CJI acts with the collegium of CJI + 4 senior-most judges.


Supreme Court vs High Court: The Comparison Table

PointSupreme CourtHigh Court
Number of judges fixed byParliament by lawPresident (Art 216)
Qualifications5 yrs HC judge / 10 yrs HC advocate / distinguished jurist10 yrs judicial office / 10 yrs HC advocate; no jurist route
Retirement6562
Oath beforePresidentGovernor
Resignation addressed toPresidentPresident
RemovalParliament, Art 124(4)Parliament, same procedure
Salaries charged onConsolidated Fund of IndiaConsolidated Fund of the State
Pensions charged onConsolidated Fund of IndiaConsolidated Fund of India
Practice after retirementNo court in India (Art 124(7))Not in the same HC; may plead in the SC and other HCs (Art 220)
WritsArt 32: Fundamental Rights only; a Fundamental Right itselfArt 226: Fundamental Rights and any other purpose; discretionary
Superintendence over lower courtsNo general power of superintendenceYes, Art 227
Acting chiefArt 126Art 223
Temporary judgesAd hoc judges (Art 127)Additional judges (Art 224)
Retired judges sitting againArt 128Art 224A

Jurisdiction and Powers of a High Court

JurisdictionDetail
OriginalSome High Courts (Calcutta, Bombay, Madras, Delhi and some others) have original civil jurisdiction in specified matters. All High Courts hear certain matters originally, such as election petitions for Parliament and the State Legislature, and matters relating to marriage, company law and contempt as laws provide
Writ (Art 226)Habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, certiorari, quo warranto, for Fundamental Rights and “any other purpose”. Wider than Art 32. Judicial review under Art 226 is part of the basic structure (L. Chandra Kumar, 1997)
AppellateCivil and criminal appeals from district and subordinate courts. A death sentence passed by a Sessions Court must be confirmed by the High Court before it is executed
Supervisory (Art 227)Superintendence over all courts and tribunals in its territory, except military tribunals. It can call for returns, make rules, prescribe forms. The power covers both administrative and judicial superintendence and can be exercised suo motu
Control over subordinate courts (Art 235)Posting, promotion, leave and discipline of the district judiciary below district judges
Court of record (Art 215)Decisions are binding precedents for subordinate courts in the State; power to punish for contempt
Judicial reviewCan declare Union and State laws and executive orders unconstitutional
Art 226 vs Art 227
  • Art 226 is about writs; a person files a petition and the court issues a writ against an authority.
  • Art 227 is about supervision of courts and tribunals in the State, to keep them within their jurisdiction. It does not extend to military tribunals and is not a second appeal on facts.

The High Court of Chhattisgarh (छत्तीसगढ़ उच्च न्यायालय)

PointDetail
SeatBilaspur; newer campus at village Bodri, Bilaspur
Established1 November 2000, under the Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000, the day the State was formed
OrderCommonly counted as the 19th High Court of India. (The Uttarakhand and Jharkhand High Courts followed later in November 2000)
Before 2000The region was under the Madhya Pradesh High Court (Jabalpur)
First Acting Chief JusticeJustice R. S. Garg (from 1 November 2000)
First regular Chief JusticeJustice W. A. Shishak
Sanctioned strength22 judges (as of 2026)
Chief Justice (as of October 2026)Justice Krushna Ram Mohapatra, sworn in in September 2026, after Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha retired on 4 September 2026 (Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal was Acting Chief Justice in between)
Chhattisgarh angle for Mains
  • The High Court decided the challenge to the State’s 58% reservation in public employment and education in September 2022, a reminder that Art 226 is the forum where state laws are tested first.
  • Its Art 227 supervision reaches district courts, family courts and tribunals across the 33 districts, including remote Bastar and Surguja.
  • Vacancies matter: in 2026 the court’s working strength stayed well below its sanctioned 22, a local example of the national vacancy and pendency problem.

Subordinate Courts (अधीनस्थ न्यायालय): Arts 233–237

ArticleProvision
233District judges are appointed, posted and promoted by the Governor in consultation with the High Court. A direct recruit must have been an advocate or pleader for at least 7 years and be recommended by the High Court
234Other judicial officers (below district judge) are appointed by the Governor after consultation with the State Public Service Commission and the High Court
235Control over district courts and subordinate courts is vested in the High Court
236Defines “district judge” (includes additional district judge, sessions judge, chief presidency magistrate, etc.) and “judicial service”
237The Governor may apply these provisions to classes of magistrates

Structure in a district

graph TD
    HC["High Court"] --> DJ["District and Sessions Judge
District Judge: civil
Sessions Judge: criminal"] DJ --> CS["Civil Judge (Senior Division)
and Chief Judicial Magistrate"] CS --> CJ["Civil Judge (Junior Division)
and Judicial Magistrate First Class"]
  • The same officer is called District Judge when hearing civil cases and Sessions Judge when hearing criminal cases.
  • A Sessions Judge can award any sentence, including death, but a death sentence needs High Court confirmation.

Alternative and accessible justice

InstitutionLawKey points
Lok Adalat (लोक अदालत)Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987Settles disputes by compromise, including pending and pre-litigation cases. Its award is deemed a decree of a civil court, is final and binding, and no appeal lies against it. No court fee; fee already paid is refunded when a pending case is settled
Legal Services AuthoritiesSame ActNALSA at the national level (CJI as Patron-in-Chief), State Legal Services Authority (Chief Justice of the HC as Patron-in-Chief), District and Taluk authorities. Implements free legal aid under Art 39A (DPSP, added by the 42nd Amendment, 1976)
Gram Nyayalaya (ग्राम न्यायालय)Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008Courts at the intermediate panchayat level for speedy, cheap justice in rural areas; presided over by a Nyayadhikari of the rank of a Judicial Magistrate First Class; can hold mobile sittings
Family CourtsFamily Courts Act, 1984Matrimonial and family disputes; conciliation first

Memory Tricks

'62 for the State, 65 for the Nation'
High Court judges retire at 62, Supreme Court judges at 65. The higher court gets three more years.
Who fixes the number? 'Parliament for the top, President for the states'
Supreme Court strength: Parliament by law (Art 124(1)). High Court strength: President (Art 216). This single swap appears in many statement questions.
Subordinate courts: '233 Governor-HC, 234 Governor-PSC-HC, 235 HC controls'
District judges: G + HC. Other judges: G + PSC + HC. Control afterwards: HC alone.

Don’t Confuse

ThisvsThat
Art 224: additional judges in a High Court (up to 2 years)vsArt 127: ad hoc judges in the Supreme Court
Art 224A: retired judges in a High CourtvsArt 128: retired judges in the Supreme Court
Art 226: writsvsArt 227: superintendence over courts and tribunals
Art 222: transfer of HC judges by the President after consulting the CJIvsArt 139A: transfer of cases by the Supreme Court
Salaries of HC judges: Consolidated Fund of the StatevsPensions of HC judges: Consolidated Fund of India
Chhattisgarh HC: Bilaspur, 1 Nov 2000vsChhattisgarh capital: Raipur (Nava Raipur Atal Nagar)

Common Mistakes

MCQ traps
  • “High Court judges can be removed by the State Legislature.” False. Only Parliament can, by the same procedure as for Supreme Court judges.
  • “A retired High Court judge cannot practise in any court.” False. He is barred only from the same High Court; he can plead in the Supreme Court and other High Courts.
  • “Parliament fixes the number of judges of each High Court.” False. The President does (Art 216).
  • “The oath of a High Court judge is administered by the Chief Justice of India.” False. Before the Governor or a person appointed by him.
  • “A distinguished jurist can be appointed a High Court judge.” False. That route exists only for the Supreme Court.
  • “An award of a Lok Adalat can be challenged in appeal.” False. It is final; no appeal lies (a writ petition on limited grounds is a different matter).
  • “Chhattisgarh’s High Court is at Raipur.” False. Bilaspur.

Practice

All questions below are original practice questions written in CGPSC style. They are not previous-year questions.

Level 1: Foundation

  1. A judge of a High Court holds office until the age of ______.
  2. The High Court of Chhattisgarh was established on ______ under the ______ Act, 2000.
  3. The control over district courts and courts subordinate to them is vested in the High Court by Article ______.
Answers
  1. 62 years.
  2. 1 November 2000; Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000.
  3. Article 235.

Level 2: Prelims MCQs

Q1. Consider the following statements:

  1. The number of judges of a High Court is determined by the President.
  2. A person who has been a permanent judge of a High Court cannot plead before any court in India after retirement.
  3. The salaries of High Court judges are charged on the Consolidated Fund of the State, but their pensions are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • (a) 1 only
  • (b) 2 and 3 only
  • (c) 1 and 3 only
  • (d) 1, 2 and 3
Answer and explanation
(c) 1 and 3 only. Art 216 leaves the number of High Court judges to the President. Statement 2 is wrong: under Art 220 a retired High Court judge is barred only from the High Court where he was a permanent judge, and can plead in the Supreme Court and other High Courts. Statement 3 is correct (Art 202(3)(d) and Art 112(3)(d)).

Q2. Match List I (High Court) with List II (Seat):

List IList II
A. Chhattisgarh1. Jabalpur
B. Madhya Pradesh2. Cuttack
C. Odisha3. Bilaspur
D. Rajasthan4. Jodhpur
  • (a) A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2
  • (b) A-1, B-3, C-2, D-4
  • (c) A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4
  • (d) A-3, B-2, C-1, D-4
Answer and explanation
(c) A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4. All four High Courts sit outside the state capital: Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur, Odisha at Cuttack and Rajasthan at Jodhpur.

Q3. Under Article 227, the High Court’s power of superintendence extends to all courts and tribunals within its territorial jurisdiction except:

  • (a) Family courts
  • (b) Tribunals constituted under laws relating to the Armed Forces
  • (c) Administrative tribunals set up under a State law
  • (d) Courts of Judicial Magistrates
Answer and explanation
(b). Art 227(4) excludes courts and tribunals constituted by or under any law relating to the Armed Forces. The same exclusion appears in Art 136(2) for the Supreme Court’s special leave jurisdiction.

Q4. Who appoints district judges in a State?

  • (a) The Chief Justice of the High Court
  • (b) The Governor, in consultation with the High Court
  • (c) The Governor, in consultation with the State Public Service Commission only
  • (d) The President, on the advice of the Chief Justice of India
Answer and explanation
(b). Art 233: the Governor appoints district judges in consultation with the High Court. The State PSC is consulted (along with the High Court) for judicial officers below district judge level under Art 234, which is why option (c) is a trap.

Level 3: Mains Answer Writing

Q1. (60 words) Distinguish between Article 226 and Article 227 of the Constitution.

Model answer outline
  • Art 226: writ jurisdiction of the High Court for Fundamental Rights and “any other purpose” against any person or authority in its territory; invoked by a petition; discretionary.
  • Art 227: superintendence over all subordinate courts and tribunals (except military tribunals); ensures they act within jurisdiction; can be exercised suo motu; not a route to re-appreciate facts.
  • One line: 226 controls authorities; 227 supervises courts.

Q2. (150–200 words) “The subordinate judiciary is where most citizens meet the justice system.” Discuss the constitutional provisions on subordinate courts and suggest reforms, with reference to Chhattisgarh.

Model answer outline
  • Intro: Most of the well over 5 crore pending cases in India (2026, NJDG and government replies in Parliament) are in district and subordinate courts.
  • Provisions: Art 233 (district judges: Governor + High Court; 7 years’ practice for direct recruits); Art 234 (other judges: Governor + State PSC + High Court); Art 235 (High Court control); Art 50 (separation from executive); Art 39A (free legal aid).
  • Problems: vacancies, poor infrastructure, adjournment culture, distance for tribal and remote areas, language barriers.
  • Reforms: filling vacancies; e-courts and virtual hearings; Lok Adalats and mediation; Gram Nyayalayas for rural access; an All India Judicial Service (Art 312, added by the 42nd Amendment) is debated.
  • Chhattisgarh angle: large, forested districts in Bastar and Surguja make distance a real barrier; Lok Adalats and legal aid through the State Legal Services Authority, and the High Court’s Art 227 supervision from Bilaspur, are the main tools to bring justice closer.
  • Conclusion: Justice delayed at the district level is justice denied for most citizens; reform must start at the bottom of the pyramid.

Quick Revision Table

FactDetail
Constitutional homePart VI, Chapter V, Arts 214–231; subordinate courts Arts 233–237
Number of High Courts25 (as of 2026)
OldestCalcutta (1862, Indian High Courts Act 1861)
NewestAndhra Pradesh (1 January 2019)
Common HCArt 231; 7th Amendment 1956
Strength fixed byPresident (Art 216)
QualificationsCitizen + 10 yrs judicial office / 10 yrs HC advocate
Retirement62 (15th Amendment, 1963)
OathGovernor
TransferArt 222, President after consulting CJI
Acting CJ / additional / retiredArts 223 / 224 / 224A
Art 226 / 227Writs / superintendence (not military tribunals)
Post-retirementCan plead in SC and other HCs (Art 220)
Chhattisgarh HCBilaspur (Bodri); 1 Nov 2000; 19th HC; 22 sanctioned judges (2026)
CG Chief Justice (Oct 2026)Krushna Ram Mohapatra (from Sept 2026)
District judgesArt 233: Governor + HC; 7 yrs practice
Other judicial officersArt 234: Governor + State PSC + HC
Lok AdalatLegal Services Authorities Act 1987; award final, no appeal
Gram NyayalayaAct of 2008; Nyayadhikari

Key Takeaways

Key Takeaways
  1. High Courts mirror the Supreme Court, but the differences are the exam: President fixes strength, retirement at 62, oath before the Governor, no jurist route, practice allowed in other courts after retirement.
  2. Art 226 (writs, wider than Art 32) and Art 227 (superintendence) make the High Court the backbone of the state’s justice system.
  3. The High Court of Chhattisgarh sits at Bilaspur, not Raipur, and dates from 1 November 2000.
  4. District judges are appointed by the Governor with the High Court (Art 233); the High Court controls subordinate courts (Art 235).
  5. Lok Adalats, legal aid and Gram Nyayalayas widen access to justice; their awards and processes are a frequent Prelims topic.

What’s Next

Advertisement