Polity Parliament

Legislative Procedure in Parliament

Ordinary, Money, Financial and Constitution Amendment Bills, stages of a bill, joint sitting (Art 108), President's veto and lapse of bills for CGPSC.

16 min read Updated Oct 2026 #parliament#legislative procedure#money bill

Prerequisites

The Hook: How Chhattisgarh Was Born in Parliament

Connect

Chhattisgarh did not come into being through a constitutional amendment. In 2000, Parliament passed an ordinary-looking bill, the Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Bill. Both Houses passed it by a simple majority, the President gave assent on 25 August 2000 (as Act No. 28 of 2000), and on 1 November 2000 a new state appeared on India’s map. Articles 3 and 4 allow this: such a law is expressly “not deemed to be an amendment” under Article 368.

So what decides whether a bill needs a simple majority, a special majority, the Rajya Sabha’s consent or even the states’ ratification? That is legislative procedure, and Prelims loves its details.

Why it matters: “Which bill can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha?”, “Which bill cannot go to a joint sitting?” and “Which bills lapse on dissolution?” are classic statement-based questions. Mains asks about misuse of the Money Bill route and declining committee scrutiny.


Four Kinds of Bills

TypeArticleWhere introducedRajya Sabha’s powerJoint sitting?President
Ordinary Bill107, 108Either HouseEqual: can amend, reject or delayYesAssent, withhold or return once
Money Bill (धन विधेयक)109, 110Lok Sabha only, on the President’s recommendationOnly recommendations within 14 days; Lok Sabha may ignore themNo (not needed)Assent or withhold; cannot return
Financial Bill (I)117(1)Lok Sabha only, on the President’s recommendationEqual once introduced: can amend or reject (an amendment other than one reducing or abolishing a tax needs the President’s recommendation)YesLike an ordinary bill
Financial Bill (II)117(3)Either House; the President’s recommendation needed for consideration, not introductionEqualYesLike an ordinary bill
Constitution Amendment Bill368Either House; no President’s recommendation neededEqual, so it has a vetoNoMust give assent (24th Amendment, 1971)

Bills are also classified by who moves them:

Government (public) billPrivate Member’s Bill (गैर-सरकारी विधेयक)
Moved by a ministerMoved by an MP who is not a minister (may be from the ruling party)
Drafted by the ministry with the Law MinistryDrafted by the member
Reflects government policy; high chance of passageOne month’s notice for introduction; discussed on Fridays (alternate Fridays, in practice)
Can be introduced any dayOnly 14 have ever become law; the last was the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, assented to in 1970

Ordinary Bill: The Five Stages

graph TD
    A["1. First Reading
Leave to introduce; bill published in the Gazette
(no discussion)"] --> B["2. Second Reading
(a) General discussion
(b) Committee stage: select, joint
or Departmental Standing Committee
(c) Consideration clause by clause"] B --> C["3. Third Reading
Accept or reject the bill as a whole;
only verbal amendments"] C --> D["4. Bill in the second House
Pass, amend, reject,
or keep pending"] D --> E["5. Assent of the President
(Art 111)"] D -.->|"Deadlock"| F["Joint sitting
(Art 108)"] F --> E
  • Second reading is the most important stage: the bill is examined in detail. The House may refer it to a select committee (members of that House), a joint committee (both Houses) or, since 1993, the relevant Departmentally Related Standing Committee (see Parliamentary Committees).
  • Second House options: pass it as sent (bill goes for assent); pass it with amendments (back to the first House); reject it; or take no action. The last three can lead to a deadlock.

Joint Sitting (संयुक्त बैठक), Article 108

When can the President summon one? When a bill passed by one House is in the other House and:

  1. it is rejected by the other House; or
  2. the Houses disagree on amendments; or
  3. more than six months pass from the date the other House receives it without its being passed. (Periods of prorogation or adjournment of more than four consecutive days are not counted.)
RuleDetail
Applies toOrdinary bills and financial bills only
Not forMoney Bills (the Lok Sabha prevails anyway) and Constitution Amendment Bills
PresidesThe Speaker; in his absence the Deputy Speaker; then the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha. The Chairman of the Rajya Sabha (Vice-President) does not preside
QuorumOne-tenth of the total members of both Houses
DecisionA majority of the total number of members of both Houses present and voting
LapseA joint sitting does not lapse on dissolution if the President has notified it before dissolution
New amendmentsOnly amendments relating to the disagreement, or made necessary by delay
Only three joint sittings so far (as of 2026)
YearBill
1961Dowry Prohibition Bill, 1959
1978Banking Service Commission (Repeal) Bill, 1977
2002Prevention of Terrorism Bill (POTA), 2002

Mnemonic: “Dowry, Banks, Terror” — 61, 78, 02.


Money Bill (Articles 109–110)

Article 110(1): A bill is a Money Bill if it contains only provisions dealing with all or any of:

  • (a) imposition, abolition, remission, alteration or regulation of any tax;
  • (b) regulation of borrowing by the Government of India;
  • (c) custody of the Consolidated Fund or the Contingency Fund of India, payment into or withdrawal from them;
  • (d) appropriation of money out of the Consolidated Fund;
  • (e) declaring any expenditure to be charged on the Consolidated Fund, or increasing such an amount;
  • (f) receipt of money on account of the Consolidated Fund or the Public Account, or its audit;
  • (g) any matter incidental to the above.

Not Money Bills (Art 110(2)): a bill merely providing for fines or penalties, fees for licences or services, or taxes imposed by a local body for local purposes.

Procedure (Art 109)

graph LR
    A["Introduced in Lok Sabha only
(President's recommendation;
Speaker's certificate)"] --> B["Passed by Lok Sabha"] B --> C["Rajya Sabha: 14 days
Recommendations only"] C --> D["Lok Sabha accepts or rejects
recommendations"] D --> E["Deemed passed by both Houses"] E --> F["President: assent or withhold
(cannot return)"]
  • If the Rajya Sabha does not return the bill within 14 days, it is deemed passed by both Houses in the form passed by the Lok Sabha.
  • The Speaker’s certificate that a bill is a Money Bill is endorsed on it when it goes to the Rajya Sabha and to the President (Art 110(4)), and the decision is “final” (Art 110(3)).
  • Because the bill is introduced with the President’s prior recommendation, the President in practice gives assent.
Money Bill controversy (Mains)

Using the Money Bill route for laws that are not purely financial keeps the Rajya Sabha out. The best-known example is the Aadhaar Act, 2016:

  • In K.S. Puttaswamy (Aadhaar), 2018, the majority upheld it as a Money Bill; Justice D.Y. Chandrachud dissented, calling its passage this way a “fraud on the Constitution”.
  • In Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank (2019), a five-judge bench held that the Speaker’s certification is not immune from judicial review and referred the correctness of the Aadhaar ruling to a larger bench.

Evaluation: the Money Bill route weakens bicameralism and federal scrutiny. Remedies suggested include strict reading of the word “only” in Art 110(1) and a reasoned Speaker’s certificate.

Money Bill vs Financial Bills

PointMoney Bill (Art 110)Financial Bill (I), Art 117(1)Financial Bill (II), Art 117(3)
ContentOnly Art 110(1) mattersArt 110(1) matters plus other mattersExpenditure from the Consolidated Fund, but no Art 110(1) matter
Introduced inLok Sabha onlyLok Sabha onlyEither House
President’s recommendationFor introductionFor introductionFor consideration only
Rajya Sabha14 days, recommendationsFull powersFull powers
Joint sittingNoYesYes
One-line rule
Every Money Bill is a financial bill, but not every financial bill is a Money Bill. The test is the word “only” in Article 110(1).

Constitution Amendment Bill (Article 368)

FeatureDetail
Introduced inEither House, by a minister or a private member; no prior permission of the President
MajoritySpecial majority in each House separately: a majority of the total membership of the House and two-thirds of members present and voting
DeadlockNo joint sitting; if one House rejects it, the bill fails
StatesAmendments to federal provisions (Art 368(2) proviso: e.g. election of the President, Union–state legislative powers, Seventh Schedule, representation of states in Parliament, Art 368 itself) also need ratification by half the State Legislatures by simple majority
PresidentMust give assent (24th Amendment, 1971); cannot withhold or return
Worked example: the 131st Amendment Bill, 2026

On 17 April 2026, the Lok Sabha voted on the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026 (Lok Sabha expansion and delimitation linked to women’s reservation).

  • Votes: 298 for, 230 against, so 528 present and voting.
  • Two-thirds of 528 = 352 needed. 298 < 352, so the bill failed, even though 298 was more than half of the House’s total membership (543 ÷ 2 = 271.5, so 272).

Lesson: a constitutional amendment must clear both tests. Here the “majority of total membership” test was met but the “two-thirds present and voting” test was not.

Remember also: some provisions can be amended by a simple majority outside Art 368 — new states (Arts 2–4, used for Chhattisgarh in 2000), creation or abolition of Legislative Councils (Art 169), the Fifth and Sixth Schedules, quorum and salaries of MPs, and others. These are expressly “not deemed amendments” for Art 368.


The President’s Assent and Veto (Article 111)

When a bill is presented, the President may:

OptionOrdinary billMoney BillConstitution Amendment Bill
Give assentYesYesMust
Withhold assent (absolute veto)YesYesNo
Return for reconsideration (suspensive veto)Yes, onceNoNo
VetoMeaningExample
AbsoluteAssent withheld; bill diesUsed e.g. for private members’ bills, or by a new Cabinet on bills of an outgoing one: PEPSU Appropriation Bill (1954) under Rajendra Prasad; Salary, Allowances and Pension of MPs (Amendment) Bill (1991) under R. Venkataraman
SuspensiveBill returned once; if repassed with or without amendment by a simple majority, the President must assentReturned bill not “overridden” by a special majority, unlike in the USA
PocketNo decision at all, because no time limit is fixed for the PresidentZail Singh on the Indian Post Office (Amendment) Bill, 1986
India has no qualified veto
A qualified veto (override only by a higher majority, as in the USA) does not exist for the Indian President. A returned bill is passed again by a simple majority. The President’s pocket veto is wider than the US President’s, because the US Constitution gives him only 10 days.

Lapse of Bills on Dissolution of the Lok Sabha

Bill’s position when the Lok Sabha is dissolvedLapses?
Pending in the Lok Sabha (introduced there or sent by the Rajya Sabha)Yes
Passed by the Lok Sabha, pending in the Rajya SabhaYes
Introduced in the Rajya Sabha and pending there (never passed by the Lok Sabha)No
Passed by both Houses, pending the President’s assentNo
Passed by both Houses, returned by the President for reconsiderationNo
Bill on which the President has notified a joint sitting before dissolutionNo

Shortcut: a bill lapses only if it is sitting in the Lok Sabha or has left the Lok Sabha and is waiting in the Rajya Sabha. A bill that has never touched the Lok Sabha, or has finished with both Houses, survives. Prorogation never causes a bill to lapse.


Memory Tricks

Bills in a sentence
  • “Money goes Lok-only, 14 days, no return, no joint.” Money Bill: Lok Sabha only, Rajya Sabha has 14 days, President cannot return it, no joint sitting.
  • “Amendments: anyone, anywhere, two tests, no joint, must sign.” Art 368: either House, private member allowed, special majority, no joint sitting, President must assent.
  • Joint sittings: “Dowry, Banks, Terror” — 1961, 1978, 2002.
  • Art 110(2) exclusions: “FFL” — Fines, Fees, Local taxes.

Don’t Confuse

ThisvsThat
Art 109 — special procedure for Money Bills (14 days)vsArt 110 — definition of a Money Bill; Speaker’s certificate
Art 117(1) Financial Bill — Lok Sabha only, joint sitting possiblevsMoney Bill — Lok Sabha only, no joint sitting
Speaker presides over a joint sittingvsChairman of the Rajya Sabha never presides over a joint sitting
Suspensive veto — returned bill repassed by simple majorityvsQualified veto (USA) — override by two-thirds; not in India
Art 368 special majority — total membership and two-thirds present and votingvsArt 249 resolution — only two-thirds present and voting in the Rajya Sabha
Art 3 new state law (Chhattisgarh, 2000) — simple majority, President’s recommendation neededvsArt 368 amendment — special majority

Common Mistakes

MCQ traps
  • “A Constitution Amendment Bill can be passed in a joint sitting.” False. There is no joint sitting for it; each House must pass it separately.
  • “A Constitution Amendment Bill needs the President’s prior recommendation.” False. That is required for Money Bills and some financial bills, not for Art 368 bills.
  • “The President can return a Money Bill for reconsideration.” False. He can only assent or withhold.
  • “A bill pending in the Rajya Sabha always lapses when the Lok Sabha is dissolved.” Only if the Lok Sabha had passed it. A bill introduced in the Rajya Sabha and still pending there survives.
  • “Six joint sittings have been held.” False. Only three: 1961, 1978, 2002 (as of 2026).
  • “A bill imposing fines is a Money Bill.” False. Art 110(2) excludes fines, penalties and licence fees.

Practice

All questions below are original practice questions written in CGPSC style. They are not previous-year questions.

Level 1: Foundation

  1. The Rajya Sabha must return a Money Bill within ______ days.
  2. A joint sitting of the two Houses is presided over by the ______.
  3. The President’s assent to a Constitution Amendment Bill was made obligatory by the ______ Amendment.
  4. The Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 was passed under Articles ______ and ______.
Answers
  1. 14 days.
  2. Speaker of the Lok Sabha.
  3. 24th Amendment (1971).
  4. Articles 3 and 4.

Level 2: Prelims MCQs

Q1. Consider the following statements:

  1. A Money Bill can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha, on the recommendation of the President.
  2. If the Rajya Sabha does not return a Money Bill within 14 days, it is deemed to have been passed by both Houses.
  3. A deadlock over a Money Bill is resolved by a joint sitting under Article 108.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  • (a) 1 only
  • (b) 1 and 2 only
  • (c) 2 and 3 only
  • (d) 1, 2 and 3
Answer and explanation
(b) 1 and 2 only. Statements 1 and 2 follow Arts 109 and 117(1). Statement 3 is wrong: Article 108 does not apply to Money Bills. No deadlock can arise because the Rajya Sabha can only recommend and the Lok Sabha decides.

Q2. Match List I (Joint sitting year) with List II (Bill):

List IList II
A. 19611. Prevention of Terrorism Bill
B. 19782. Dowry Prohibition Bill
C. 20023. Banking Service Commission (Repeal) Bill
  • (a) A-2, B-3, C-1
  • (b) A-3, B-2, C-1
  • (c) A-2, B-1, C-3
  • (d) A-1, B-3, C-2
Answer and explanation
(a) A-2, B-3, C-1. Dowry Prohibition (1961), Banking Service Commission Repeal (1978), Prevention of Terrorism (2002). These remain the only three joint sittings as of 2026.

Q3. Which of the following bills will not lapse on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha?

  1. A bill passed by the Lok Sabha and pending in the Rajya Sabha
  2. A bill introduced in the Rajya Sabha and pending there
  3. A bill passed by both Houses and returned by the President for reconsideration
  4. A bill pending in the Lok Sabha
  • (a) 1 and 4 only
  • (b) 2 and 3 only
  • (c) 1, 2 and 3 only
  • (d) 2, 3 and 4 only
Answer and explanation
(b) 2 and 3 only. Bills pending in the Lok Sabha (4) and bills passed by it but pending in the Rajya Sabha (1) lapse. A Rajya Sabha bill that never reached the Lok Sabha (2) and a bill returned by the President (3) survive.

Q4. A bill provides only for the imposition of fines for violating a new traffic rule. Which statement is correct?

  • (a) It is a Money Bill because it involves receipt of money
  • (b) It is not a Money Bill, by virtue of Article 110(2)
  • (c) It is a Financial Bill under Article 117(1)
  • (d) It must be introduced only in the Lok Sabha
Answer and explanation
(b). Article 110(2) says a bill is not a Money Bill merely because it provides for fines or other pecuniary penalties, fees for licences or services, or local taxes. Such a bill can be introduced in either House.

Q5. With reference to a Constitution Amendment Bill under Article 368, which one of the following is correct?

  • (a) It can be introduced only by a minister
  • (b) It requires the prior recommendation of the President
  • (c) If the two Houses disagree, the President may summon a joint sitting
  • (d) It can be introduced in either House of Parliament
Answer and explanation
(d). An amendment bill can be introduced in either House, by a minister or a private member, without the President’s recommendation. There is no joint sitting for it.

Level 3: Mains Answer Writing

Q1. (150–200 words) Distinguish between a Money Bill and a Financial Bill. Is the use of the Money Bill route for non-financial legislation a threat to bicameralism?

Model answer outline
  • Intro: Arts 110 and 117 create a hierarchy of financial legislation in which the Lok Sabha, the House answerable for supply, has the upper hand.
  • Distinction: “only” Art 110(1) matters vs mixed content; Rajya Sabha’s 14-day recommendatory role vs full powers; no joint sitting vs joint sitting; Speaker’s certificate; President cannot return a Money Bill.
  • The concern: certifying mixed bills as Money Bills (e.g. Aadhaar Act, 2016) bypasses the Rajya Sabha, the states’ chamber; Justice Chandrachud’s dissent in Puttaswamy (2018); Rojer Mathew (2019): certificate open to judicial review, issue referred to a larger bench.
  • Counter-view: the Lok Sabha is the directly elected House; financial urgency; Speaker’s office is constitutional.
  • Way forward: strict reading of “only”; reasoned certificates; committee scrutiny before certification.
  • Conclusion: the Money Bill is a necessary fast track, but stretching it erodes the federal check the Rajya Sabha was meant to supply.

Q2. (60–80 words) Explain the three kinds of veto available to the President of India.

Model answer outline
  • Absolute veto: withholding assent (PEPSU Appropriation Bill, 1954).
  • Suspensive veto: returning an ordinary bill once; repassed by simple majority, assent is binding. Not available for Money or Amendment Bills.
  • Pocket veto: no time limit under Art 111, so the bill may be kept pending (Indian Post Office (Amendment) Bill, 1986).
  • Conclusion: India has no qualified veto; the President’s veto is a delaying and reflective check, not a rival will.

Quick Revision Table

FactDetail
Art 107 / 108Introduction and passing of bills / joint sitting
Art 109 / 110Money Bill procedure / definition
Art 111Assent to bills; veto
Art 117Financial Bills
Art 368Amendment; special majority; half the states for federal matters
Joint sittingOrdinary + financial bills; Speaker presides; 1961, 1978, 2002
Six-month ruleJoint sitting if a bill is pending more than six months in the other House
Money BillLok Sabha only; Rajya Sabha 14 days; Speaker’s certificate final; President cannot return
Art 110(2) exclusionsFines, licence/service fees, local taxes
24th Amendment (1971)President must assent to amendment bills
Pocket vetoZail Singh, Indian Post Office (Amendment) Bill, 1986
Private members’ bills14 enacted, last in 1970
131st Amendment Bill, 2026298–230 on 17 April 2026; failed two-thirds test
ChhattisgarhCreated by MP Reorganisation Act, 2000 (Arts 3, 4); assent 25 August 2000

Key Takeaways

Key Takeaways
  1. Four kinds of bills differ on where introduced, Rajya Sabha’s power, joint sitting and the President’s options; learn the comparison table.
  2. A joint sitting is for ordinary and financial bills only; the Speaker presides; only three have been held.
  3. A Money Bill must contain only Art 110(1) matters; the Speaker’s certificate is final but now open to judicial review.
  4. Art 368 needs both tests in each House separately, with no joint sitting, and the President must assent.
  5. New states like Chhattisgarh are created by simple-majority laws under Arts 3 and 4, not by Art 368.

What’s Next

Advertisement