Pest Management and IPM
Crop pests, diseases and weeds; pesticide classes, WHO colour labels and the 3R problem; biocontrol; IPM with ETL and EIL; fall armyworm and locusts, for CGPSC Mains.
Prerequisites
- Crop Science and Cropping Systems: crop rotation and intercropping are the first line of pest control
- Seed Technology and Crop Improvement: resistant varieties and Bt cotton
- Organic and Natural Farming: botanical and biological inputs
The Hook: Gangai in the Paddy
Ask an older farmer in Rajnandgaon or Kanker about gangai (गंगई) and you will hear about a pest that turns rice tillers into hollow, onion-leaf-like silver shoots that never bear grain. This is the rice gall midge, one of the most damaging rice pests of Chhattisgarh and the Bastar plateau. For years the answer was to spray. Then breeders bred resistant varieties, the insect evolved new biotypes that overcame them, and farmers learned that spraying alone does not work.
Why do pests keep coming back stronger? When is spraying worth its cost? Can wasps, fungi and pheromones do part of the job? These questions define Integrated Pest Management (IPM).
Why it matters: Mains GS-II asks about IPM, biopesticides, pesticide regulation and the “3R” problem. Pest outbreaks such as fall armyworm and desert locusts appear in current-affairs-linked questions. Chhattisgarh also hosts a national institute devoted to biotic stress in crops.
What Counts as a “Pest”?
A pest (नाशीजीव) is any organism that reduces crop yield or quality enough to matter economically.
| Group | Examples | Typical crops |
|---|---|---|
| Insect pests | Stem borers, gall midge, planthoppers, bollworms, aphids, locusts | Rice, cotton, pulses, vegetables |
| Diseases (रोग) | Fungal: rice blast, wheat rust, late blight of potato; Bacterial: bacterial leaf blight of rice; Viral: tungro (rice), yellow mosaic (pulses) | All crops |
| Weeds (खरपतवार) | Echinochloa (barnyard grass) in rice, Phalaris minor in wheat, Parthenium, Lantana | All crops; weeds compete for light, water and nutrients |
| Nematodes | Root-knot nematode | Vegetables, pulses |
| Vertebrates | Rodents, birds, wild boar, stray cattle | Field and stored grain |
| Storage pests | Rice weevil, khapra beetle, pulse beetle | Stored grain |
Key rice pests and diseases of Chhattisgarh
| Pest or disease | Type | Damage symptom | Local name |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yellow stem borer | Insect (larva bores stem) | Dead heart in young plants; white ear (empty white panicle) at heading | तना छेदक |
| Rice gall midge | Insect (fly larva) | Silver shoot or onion leaf; tiller produces no panicle | Gangai (गंगई) |
| Brown planthopper (BPH) | Insect (sucks sap at plant base) | Hopper burn: circular patches of dried plants | भूरा माहू |
| Rice blast | Fungus (Magnaporthe oryzae) | Spindle-shaped leaf spots; neck blast breaks the panicle | झुलसा |
| Bacterial leaf blight | Bacterium (Xanthomonas oryzae) | Yellowing and drying from leaf tips and margins | — |
| Khaira | Not a pest: zinc deficiency | Rusty brown patches | खैरा |
Methods of Pest Control
| Method | What it means | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Cultural (शस्य) | Changing farm practices so the pest finds it harder to thrive | Crop rotation, timely sowing, resistant varieties, balanced fertiliser (excess N attracts BPH and blast), field sanitation, trap crops |
| Mechanical and physical | Removing or trapping pests directly | Hand-picking egg masses, light traps, sticky traps, bird perches, solar heat for stored grain |
| Biological (जैविक) | Using living natural enemies | Parasitoids, predators, pathogens (see below) |
| Behavioural | Using insect signals | Pheromone traps for monitoring and mass trapping; mating disruption |
| Chemical (रासायनिक) | Synthetic pesticides | Insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, rodenticides |
| Host plant resistance | Varieties that resist or tolerate pests | Gall-midge-resistant rice, Bt cotton |
| Legal (regulatory) | Laws to stop pests spreading and regulate pesticides | Plant quarantine; Insecticides Act, 1968 |
Biological control agents
| Agent | Type | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Trichogramma (wasp) | Egg parasitoid: lays its eggs inside pest eggs. Released as “Tricho-cards” | Eggs of stem borers, bollworms, sugarcane borers |
| Ladybird beetles, spiders, mirid bugs | Predators | Aphids, planthoppers |
| Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) | Bacterium: its Cry protein is toxic to caterpillars | Caterpillars; also the gene source for Bt cotton |
| Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus (NPV) | Virus, host-specific | Helicoverpa (gram pod borer), Spodoptera |
| Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium | Entomopathogenic fungi (infect insects) | Many insect pests; Metarhizium is used against locusts |
| Trichoderma | Antagonistic fungus | Soil-borne fungal diseases (root rot, wilt); used for seed treatment |
| Pseudomonas fluorescens | Antagonistic bacterium | Blast, sheath blight and other diseases |
| Zygogramma bicolorata (Mexican beetle) | Insect that feeds on the weed | Parthenium (गाजर घास) |
| Neochetina weevils | Insects that feed on the weed | Water hyacinth |
| Neem (Azadirachta indica), azadirachtin | Botanical pesticide; antifeedant and growth disruptor | Many sucking and chewing pests |
Chemical Pesticides: Classes, Labels and Problems
Classification
| By target | By chemistry (insecticides) | Mode of action |
|---|---|---|
| Insecticides, fungicides, herbicides (weedicides), rodenticides, nematicides, acaricides | Organochlorines (DDT, endosulfan): persistent, bioaccumulate | Contact: kills on touch |
| Organophosphates (malathion, chlorpyrifos, monocrotophos): inhibit acetylcholinesterase | Stomach poison: kills when eaten | |
| Carbamates (carbaryl): similar action, less persistent | Systemic: absorbed and moved in the plant sap, so sap-sucking pests are killed (e.g. neonicotinoids such as imidacloprid) | |
| Synthetic pyrethroids (cypermethrin): based on natural pyrethrins | Fumigant: acts as a gas (aluminium phosphide for stored grain) | |
| Neonicotinoids (imidacloprid): systemic; linked to bee decline |
The WHO-style toxicity label (colour triangle)
Every pesticide container in India carries a diamond-shaped symbol whose lower triangle is coloured to show toxicity:
| Colour | Toxicity class |
|---|---|
| Red | Extremely toxic |
| Yellow | Highly toxic |
| Blue | Moderately toxic |
| Green | Slightly toxic |
The “3R” problem of pesticide overuse
| R | What happens | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Resistance | Repeated spraying selects pests that survive; the chemical stops working | Bollworms against pyrethroids; pink bollworm against Bt cotton |
| Resurgence | The pesticide kills natural enemies more than the pest, so the pest bounces back worse | Brown planthopper outbreaks after indiscriminate spraying in rice |
| Residue | Pesticide remains in food, soil and water | Residues above maximum residue limits (MRL); health risks; export rejections |
Other harms: secondary pest outbreaks (minor pests become major once enemies are killed), biomagnification of persistent chemicals up the food chain, poisoning of farm workers, and harm to pollinators.
- Insecticides Act, 1968 and Insecticides Rules, 1971: registration, manufacture, sale and use of pesticides.
- Central Insecticides Board and Registration Committee (CIB&RC): the Board advises; the Registration Committee registers pesticides. It works under the Directorate of Plant Protection, Quarantine and Storage at Faridabad.
- Destructive Insects and Pests Act, 1914 and the Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India) Order, 2003: stop foreign pests entering.
- Endosulfan was banned by the Supreme Court in 2011 after its effects in Kasaragod (Kerala).
- A Pesticides Management Bill to replace the 1968 Act has been drafted several times (2008, 2018, 2020, and again as a 2025 draft); it had not been enacted as of 2026.
Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
IPM (एकीकृत नाशीजीव प्रबंधन) is the combined use of all suitable methods, cultural, mechanical, biological, behavioural, host resistance and chemical, to keep pest populations below the level that causes economic loss, with the least harm to people, natural enemies and the environment. The goal is management, not eradication. Chemicals are used as a last resort and only when monitoring shows they are needed.
The threshold idea
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Economic Injury Level (EIL) (आर्थिक क्षति स्तर) | The lowest pest population at which the damage equals the cost of control. Above it, you lose money by not acting |
| Economic Threshold Level (ETL) (आर्थिक देहली स्तर) | The population at which control should begin, set below the EIL so that action takes effect before the EIL is reached |
| General Equilibrium Position | The average pest level over time, without intervention |
Example of an ETL in practice: for yellow stem borer in rice, an ETL is often given as a small percentage of dead hearts or a number of moths per pheromone trap per week. Below that, the farmer does not spray, and natural enemies are left to work.
graph TD
A["Monitor the field
(scouting, pheromone and light traps, AESA)"] --> B{"Pest population
above ETL?"}
B -- "No" --> C["Do not spray
Keep cultural, mechanical
and biological measures"]
B -- "Yes" --> D["Act: first biocontrol and
botanicals; then a selective
chemical at the right dose"]
D --> A
C --> ATools of an IPM programme
- Prevention: resistant varieties, clean seed, seed treatment with Trichoderma, crop rotation, timely and synchronous sowing across a village, balanced fertiliser
- Monitoring: field scouting, pheromone traps, light traps, Agro-Ecosystem Analysis (AESA), in which farmers count pests and natural enemies before deciding
- Habitat management: trap crops (e.g. marigold around tomato for fruit borer, or as a nematode trap), border crops, refuge rows of non-Bt cotton, flowering plants that shelter natural enemies, bird perches
- Biological control: Trichogramma cards, NPV, Beauveria, conservation of spiders and ladybirds
- Need-based chemicals: selective, least-toxic chemicals at the right dose, time and place
- Farmer Field Schools (FFS): season-long, field-based learning, pioneered for rice IPM in Asia (notably Indonesia) in the late 1980s, and used in India
India’s IPM system: the ICAR–National Centre for Integrated Pest Management (NCIPM), New Delhi, does research; Central Integrated Pest Management Centres (CIPMCs) in the states, under the Directorate of Plant Protection, Quarantine and Storage, run surveillance, biocontrol production and farmer training.
- Knowledge-intensive: farmers must monitor and judge thresholds, which takes training
- Pesticide dealers often double as advisers and sell the spray
- Small, fragmented fields: one farmer’s restraint is undone by a neighbour’s spraying
- Biocontrol supply: living agents have short shelf lives and patchy availability
- Way forward: village-level (area-wide) IPM, Farmer Field Schools, KVK and CIPMC outreach, digital pest surveillance and advisories, Bio-input Resource Centres, strict regulation of hazardous pesticides
Case studies for Mains
| Case | What happened | Lesson |
|---|---|---|
| Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) | An invasive moth from the Americas, first reported in India in 2018 in Karnataka, on maize; spread across the country | Invasive pests need quarantine, surveillance and quick biocontrol (NPV, Metarhizium, egg parasitoids) |
| Desert locust | Large swarms entered western and central India in 2019–20, the worst in decades | Transboundary pests need regional cooperation (FAO, Locust Warning Organisation at Jodhpur), drones and early warning |
| Pink bollworm and Bt cotton | Resistance to Bt cotton by the mid-2010s | Refuge crops and IPM are needed even with GM crops |
| Endosulfan in Kasaragod | Aerial spraying on cashew plantations linked to severe health effects; Supreme Court ban in 2011 | Residue and health costs of persistent chemicals |
The Chhattisgarh angle
- Rice IPM matters most: gall midge, stem borer and BPH are the key pests; overuse of nitrogen invites BPH and blast.
- IGKV, Raipur and its regional stations breed gall-midge-resistant rice and run pest forecasting; NIBSM, Raipur researches biotic stress nationally.
- Bastar and the northern hills use few chemicals, a base for IPM and organic production.
- Stray cattle and wild animals (including elephant movement in the northern districts) are vertebrate “pests” that discourage rabi cropping, a social problem as much as a scientific one.
Memory Tricks
Don’t Confuse
| This | vs | That |
|---|---|---|
| ETL: level at which to start control | vs | EIL: level at which damage equals control cost (ETL is lower) |
| Parasitoid (Trichogramma): develops inside one host and kills it | vs | Predator (ladybird): eats many prey |
| Trichoderma: fungus against diseases | vs | Trichogramma: wasp against insect eggs |
| Resistance: pest no longer killed by the chemical | vs | Resurgence: pest returns in larger numbers after spraying |
| Systemic pesticide: moves in sap | vs | Contact pesticide: acts on touch |
| Khaira (zinc deficiency) | vs | Blast (fungal disease) in rice |
| CIB&RC: registers pesticides (Faridabad) | vs | NCIPM: ICAR research centre for IPM (New Delhi) |
Common Mistakes
- “IPM means no pesticides.” False. IPM allows need-based chemical use when monitoring shows the pest has crossed the ETL.
- “IPM aims to eradicate pests.” False. It aims to keep them below the economic level.
- “Trichoderma is a parasitic wasp.” False. Trichoderma is a fungus; Trichogramma is the wasp.
- “Green label means the pesticide is safe.” False. Green means slightly toxic, not non-toxic.
- “Resurgence and resistance are the same.” False. Resurgence follows the killing of natural enemies; resistance is genetic adaptation of the pest.
Practice
All questions below are original practice questions written in CGPSC style. They are not previous-year questions.
Level 1: Foundation
- The pest population level at which control measures should be started is called the ______.
- The egg parasitoid released in fields as “Tricho-cards” is ______.
- The rice pest known in Chhattisgarh as gangai is the ______.
Answers
- Economic Threshold Level (ETL).
- Trichogramma.
- Rice gall midge.
Level 2: Prelims-style MCQs
Q1. Consider the following statements about Integrated Pest Management:
- Its aim is to eradicate pest populations completely.
- Chemical pesticides may be used when the pest population crosses the economic threshold level.
- The economic threshold level is set lower than the economic injury level.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- (a) 1 only
- (b) 2 and 3 only
- (c) 1 and 3 only
- (d) 1, 2 and 3
Answer and explanation
Q2. Match List I (Biocontrol agent) with List II (Target):
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| A. Trichoderma | 1. Parthenium weed |
| B. Trichogramma | 2. Soil-borne fungal diseases |
| C. Zygogramma bicolorata | 3. Water hyacinth |
| D. Neochetina weevils | 4. Eggs of stem borers and bollworms |
- (a) A-2, B-4, C-1, D-3
- (b) A-4, B-2, C-1, D-3
- (c) A-2, B-4, C-3, D-1
- (d) A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3
Answer and explanation
Q3. A pesticide container carries a yellow triangle label. This indicates that the product is:
- (a) Extremely toxic
- (b) Highly toxic
- (c) Moderately toxic
- (d) Slightly toxic
Answer and explanation
Q4. Brown planthopper outbreaks in rice after repeated broad-spectrum insecticide spraying are an example of:
- (a) Pest resistance
- (b) Pest resurgence
- (c) Biomagnification
- (d) Host plant resistance
Answer and explanation
Q5. Fall armyworm, an invasive pest first reported in India in 2018, mainly attacks:
- (a) Rice
- (b) Maize
- (c) Cotton
- (d) Sugarcane
Answer and explanation
Level 3: Mains Answer Writing
Q1. (60 words) What is the “3R” problem of pesticide overuse?
Model answer outline
- Resistance: repeated spraying selects resistant pests (bollworms, pink bollworm on Bt cotton).
- Resurgence: killing natural enemies lets the pest rebound (brown planthopper in rice).
- Residue: chemicals persist in food, soil and water above MRLs, harming health and exports.
- Answer: IPM with need-based, selective chemical use.
Q2. (150–200 words) “Integrated Pest Management is a knowledge-intensive, not input-intensive, approach.” Discuss its components and the challenges in adopting it in Chhattisgarh.
Model answer outline
- Intro: IPM combines all suitable methods to keep pests below the economic threshold, with chemicals as a last resort.
- Components: prevention (resistant varieties, seed treatment with Trichoderma, rotation, balanced N); monitoring (scouting, pheromone and light traps, AESA, ETL and EIL); biological control (Trichogramma, NPV, Beauveria); habitat management (trap and border crops, refuges); need-based selective chemicals.
- Why knowledge-intensive: decisions depend on counting pests and natural enemies and judging thresholds, not on spraying by calendar.
- Chhattisgarh context: rice IPM against gall midge (gangai), stem borer and BPH; IGKV’s resistant varieties; NIBSM Raipur’s research; low-input tribal belts as natural IPM zones.
- Challenges: limited extension and Farmer Field Schools; pesticide dealers as advisers; small fields and uncoordinated spraying; short shelf life of biocontrol agents; stray cattle and wild animals.
- Way forward: area-wide village IPM, KVK and CIPMC training, digital pest advisories, Bio-input Resource Centres, stricter pesticide regulation.
- Conclusion: IPM protects yields, health and natural enemies at once, but only if farmers are trained to use it.
Quick Revision Table
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| IPM goal | Keep pests below economic levels, not eradicate |
| ETL vs EIL | ETL (act) is set below EIL (damage = control cost) |
| Label colours | Red extremely, yellow highly, blue moderately, green slightly toxic |
| 3R problem | Resistance, resurgence, residue |
| Pesticide law | Insecticides Act 1968; CIB&RC; Directorate of PPQS, Faridabad |
| Pesticides Management Bill | Drafted 2008, 2018, 2020, 2025; not enacted as of 2026 |
| Endosulfan | Banned by Supreme Court, 2011 |
| Trichogramma | Egg parasitoid wasp |
| Trichoderma | Antagonistic fungus against soil-borne diseases |
| NPV | Virus against Helicoverpa, Spodoptera |
| Parthenium biocontrol | Zygogramma bicolorata |
| Fall armyworm | First reported 2018, Karnataka, maize |
| Desert locust | Major outbreak 2019–20; Locust Warning Organisation, Jodhpur |
| Rice gall midge | Gangai; silver shoot |
| Stem borer | Dead heart, white ear |
| BPH | Hopper burn |
| NIBSM | Baronda, Raipur; approved 2012 |
| NCIPM | ICAR, New Delhi |
Key Takeaways
- Pests include insects, diseases, weeds, nematodes and vertebrates; rice in Chhattisgarh faces gall midge, stem borer, BPH and blast.
- Overreliance on chemicals brings the 3Rs: resistance, resurgence and residue.
- IPM combines prevention, monitoring, biocontrol and need-based chemicals around the ETL concept.
- Biocontrol agents (Trichogramma, Trichoderma, NPV, Bt, Beauveria) and pheromone traps are the science behind fewer sprays.
- Fall armyworm, locusts and pink bollworm show why surveillance and resistance management matter.
What’s Next
- Agricultural Science — Quick Revision: the whole chapter on one page
- Biotechnology: Bt genes and biopesticides in more depth
- Pollution and Waste Management: pesticide residues and biomagnification
- Agriculture and the Economy: crop insurance and losses from pest outbreaks